There's something
about pink. When I was younger a taste for pink or an inclination to
wear it was a sure sign of homosexuality. The pop psychologists were
all over that one, along with body language and the distant father
thing; utter bullshit all of it and still is. Nevertheless it was
important not to wear anything pink, lest it be thought... you know.
Why anyone thought there should be some subcultural code going on, I
can't imagine. Obviously there are and always have been subcultural
codes, but to work they really need to confine themselves to the
subculture and be unambiguous. Asking my new line manager when I
first started work if he'd like me to suck his dick was not a mistake
I would make twice; why else would he wear a pink tie? Saucy little tart, he had it coming to him.
That said I must
admit I have an affinity for pink. More along the deliberate outrage
line than some innate desire to have the decorative taste of a ten
year old girl. I obviously have no such taste, I am a grown up man
with mature tastes. Temper tantrums on the other hand...
So here are a couple
of cardigans, one red with pink buttons and one pink with pink
buttons.
Does that look much
less butch than red with red I wonder? The real question is about the
semiology of the cardigan in general and I'm saving that for my
magnum opus (I'll be inviting people home to see that!).
In this day and age
would the pop psychologist read too much into wearing a pink
cardigan? I would, for certain but then objectivity in the cardigan
department has never been my strong point. I'm going to go out to the
bank when I've finished writing this. Let's find out.
No comments:
Post a Comment